<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NUnit 2.4.7 includes RowTest Extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/</link>
	<description>Assert.That(this, Is.TheTruth());</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PKSpence</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-3986</link>
		<dc:creator>PKSpence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/#comment-3986</guid>
		<description>@Allen
Did you ever get a response to your query. I&#039;m in the same boat, regarding creating the test cases on the fly, specifically from an Excel worksheet.

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Allen<br />
Did you ever get a response to your query. I&#8217;m in the same boat, regarding creating the test cases on the fly, specifically from an Excel worksheet.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Converting Excel date format to System.DateTime</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-479</link>
		<dc:creator>Converting Excel date format to System.DateTime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 07:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/#comment-479</guid>
		<description>[...] exercise was interesting to me, because it was a perfect case to try out the [RowTest] and [Row] attributes which now ship with NUnit. The classic NUnit version of the test would look something [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] exercise was interesting to me, because it was a perfect case to try out the [RowTest] and [Row] attributes which now ship with NUnit. The classic NUnit version of the test would look something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-399</link>
		<dc:creator>Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/#comment-399</guid>
		<description>RowTest is cool, but in my case I need to build the row test case on the fly -- I have a for loop getting data from database to generate test cases, and I need to dynamically build rowtest to attributes then apply to testFunction, is there a easy way to do it? any example code can share?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RowTest is cool, but in my case I need to build the row test case on the fly &#8212; I have a for loop getting data from database to generate test cases, and I need to dynamically build rowtest to attributes then apply to testFunction, is there a easy way to do it? any example code can share?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>RowTest is a great extension. Here&#039;s a feature request for you. 

How about having the ability to specify an ExpectedException for one or more rows of your test data?

I&#039;m not sure if this would be the best syntax but something like:

[RowTest]
	 [Row( 1000, 10, 100.0000)]
	 [Row(-1000, 10, -100.0000)]
	 [Row( 1000, 7, 142.85715)]
	 [Row( 1000, 0.00001, 100000000)]
	 [Row(4195835, 3145729, 1.3338196)]
                 [Row(1, 0, 0, ExpectedException = &quot;System.DivideByZeroException&quot; )]
	 public void DivisionTest(double numerator, double denominator, double result)
	 {
	 	Assert.AreEqual(result, numerator / denominator, 0.00001);
	 }</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RowTest is a great extension. Here&#8217;s a feature request for you. </p>
<p>How about having the ability to specify an ExpectedException for one or more rows of your test data?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if this would be the best syntax but something like:</p>
<p>[RowTest]<br />
	 [Row( 1000, 10, 100.0000)]<br />
	 [Row(-1000, 10, -100.0000)]<br />
	 [Row( 1000, 7, 142.85715)]<br />
	 [Row( 1000, 0.00001, 100000000)]<br />
	 [Row(4195835, 3145729, 1.3338196)]<br />
                 [Row(1, 0, 0, ExpectedException = "System.DivideByZeroException" )]<br />
	 public void DivisionTest(double numerator, double denominator, double result)<br />
	 {<br />
	 	Assert.AreEqual(result, numerator / denominator, 0.00001);<br />
	 }</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-schlapsi.com/2008/03/31/nunit-247-includes-rowtest-extension/#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Works great. The RowTest-attribute now works fine with the Category inclusion/exlcusion too. Porting the older tests was not much of a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Works great. The RowTest-attribute now works fine with the Category inclusion/exlcusion too. Porting the older tests was not much of a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
